Cadaveric Adipose-Derived Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine and Research.

Advances in regenerative medicine have enabled the search for new solutions to current health problems in so far unexplored fields. Thus, we focused on cadaveric subcutaneous fat as a promising source of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) that have potential to differentiate into different cell lines. With this aim, we isolated and characterized ADSCs from cadaveric samples with a postmortem interval ranging from 30 to 55 h and evaluated their ability to differentiate into chondrocytes or osteocytes. A commercial ADSC line was used as reference. Morphological and protein expression analyses were used to confirm the final stage of differentiation. Eight out of fourteen samples from patients were suitable to complete the whole protocol. Cadaveric ADSCs exhibited features of stem cells based upon several markers: CD29 (84.49 ± 14.07%), CD105 (94.38 ± 2.09%), and CD44 (99.77 ± 0.32%). The multiparametric assessment of differentiation confirmed the generation of stable lines of chondrocytes and osteocytes. In conclusion, we provide evidence supporting the feasibility of obtaining viable postmortem human subcutaneous fat ADSCs with potential application in tissue engineering and research fields.

Manejo con cirugía conservadora de tumor mucinoso infiltrante ovárico coexistente con tumor mucinoso borderline contralateral en gestante de 8 semanas / Conservative surgery for management of invasive mucinous ovarian tumor with concurrent borderline mucinous tumor on contralateral ovary in a woman in 8th week of pregnancy

INTRODUCCIÓN: Aproximadamente un 4% de mujeres embarazadas presentan tumoraciones anexiales en el primer trimestre de gestación, siendo la mayoría quistes anexiales simples. Solo el 1,5% persisten tras el primer trimestre y en torno al 0,9% son malignos. CASO CLÍNICO: Paciente de 31 años que consultó en urgencias por sangrado y amenorrea de 5 semanas. La ecografía transvaginal evidenció un saco gestacional intraútero y una tumoración anexial izquierda compleja de 68 mm, multilocular, sólida, de ecogenicidad mixta, con septos gruesos y un área sólida vascularizada de 40 mm, sospechosa de neoplasia de ovario. Se realizó manejo quirúrgico conservador mediante anexectomía bilateral laparoscópica en la octava semana de gestación. El diagnóstico fue de adenocarcinoma mucinoso infiltrante bien diferenciado en ovario derecho, coexistente con tumor mucinoso borderline en ovario izquierdo (etapa IC FIGO). El embarazo cursó con normalidad, a excepción de feto pequeño para la edad gestacional en la semana 39. Se finalizó la gestación en la semana 40 mediante parto vaginal. Debido al deseo de la paciente, la cirugía se realizó en el primer trimestre de embarazo en lugar de en el segundo como se recomienda. La cirugía se completó meses después del parto, con histerectomía y apendicectomía laparoscópica. DISCUSIÓN: El cáncer de ovario es el segundo tumor ginecológico más diagnosticado durante el embarazo. Suele diagnosticarse en el primer trimestre debido al cribado ecográfico gestacional. Ocurre en mujeres con baja paridad y en sus últimos años de edad reproductiva. Esto podría verse reflejado en un aumento de su incidencia debido al retraso de la edad materna al primer embarazo. Normalmente se diagnostica en etapa I, siendo entonces la supervivencia superior al 90% a los 5 años. En etapas iniciales en mujeres embarazadas, la laparoscopia es tan válida como la laparotomía.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 4% of pregnant women present adnexal tumors in the first trimester of gestation, the majority being simple adnexal cysts. Only 1.5% persist after the first trimester and around 0.9% are malignant. CASE REPORT: 31-year-old patient who came to the emergency room because of spotting and 5-week amenorrhea. A transvaginal ultrasound revealed an intrauterine gestational sac and a 69 mm complex multiocular-solid left adnexal tumor, with thick septa and a solid vascularized area of 40 mm, with suspicion of ovarian neoplasia. Conservative surgical management was performed through laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in eighth week of gestation. The diagnosis was a well-differentiated infiltrating mucinous adenocarcinoma in the right ovary, and a coexisting borderline mucinous tumor in the left ovary (FIGO stage IC). The pregnancy proceeded normally except for a small for gestational age fetus at week 39 and pregnancy was completed at week 40 by vaginal delivery. Due to the patients wishes, the surgery was performed in the 1st trimester of pregnancy instead in the 2nd as is recommended. Final surgery was completed after giving birth, with laparoscopic hysterectomy and appendectomy. DISCUSSION: Ovarian cancer is the second most diagnosed gynecological tumor during pregnancy. It is usually diagnosed during the first trimester with gestational ultrasound screening. It occurs in women with low parity and in their later years of reproductive age. This could be reflected in an increase in its incidence due to the delay in the age of first pregnancy. Normally it is diagnosed in stage I, when the survival rate is superior to 90% after 5 years. In early stages, laparoscopic surgery in pregnant women is as valid as laparotomy.

Improving tumour budding evaluation in colon cancer by extending the assessment area in colectomy specimens.

AIMS: It is recommended that tumour budding in colon cancer be counted on haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections in a hotspot area of 0.785 mm2 with a ×20 microscope objective. However, tumour buds may be difficult to visualise on haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections, and counting in such a limited area may result in overestimation in cases with focal budding. The aim of this study was to assess the contributions of various factors to improving tumour budding risk stratification: increasing the number of fields counted, using cytokeratin immunostaining, and recording proliferation, the apoptotic index and the emperipoletic index in tumour buds. METHODS AND RESULTS: We created an exploratory series composed of 172 cases of colon cancer in all stages, and we analysed the survival probability in a second cohort of 158 stage I-II patients. According to our results, counting of budding in 10 fields was the only factor that was significantly correlated with disease-free survival probability in stage I-II patients [hazard ratio (HR) for high versus low grade of 7.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.54-27.92, P = 0.01; HR for intermediate versus low grade of 3.02, 95% CI 1.54-26.72, P = 0.04). Emperipolesis was frequently observed in tumour buds, whereas the mitotic index and the apoptotic index were extremely low. Although cytokeratin immunostaining increased interobserver concordance, it did not improve the accuracy of tumour budding grading. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, counting in 10 fields significantly enhanced the budding grade risk stratification in colon cancer patients, and cytokeratin immunostaining could be reserved as a complementary technique for challenging cases with an inflammatory infiltrate and/or striking fibrosis.